For engineering hiring forums

Hire against a bar,
not a gut feeling.

Hirebar lets a forum of senior engineers score every candidate independently, on one template, and turns their scores into a decision you can explain, plus a brief the hiring manager can act on.

Sign in with Google or an email link. Free to start; your first workspace takes two minutes.

0%
Mid ≥ 70
High ≥ 85
100%
78%

Every candidate lands somewhere on the same line. Where the line sits is your decision; whether a candidate clears it is no longer one person's opinion.

Why hiring decisions drift

Not because anyone is careless. Because of how the process is usually shaped.

01

The manager who needs the hire sets the bar

They are also the person under the most pressure to fill the seat. The bar moves with the backlog.

02

Interviewers anchor on each other

The second opinion is formed after hearing the first. Two interviews become one, with extra steps.

03

The decision lives in a Slack thread

"Good vibes, strong on backend, a bit junior on design." Six months later nobody can say why the hire was made.

How it works

A standing forum of gatekeepers, two of them on every candidate, scoring on the same template.

Step 1 · Score blind

Each gatekeeper scores alone

Every metric gets a 1–10, a verdict and a few lines of evidence. Until you submit, nobody else's scores exist for you, and the database, not just the page, enforces it.

  • 24 metrics in three weighted categories, editable per workspace
  • Guidance per metric: what a 10 looks like
  • Submit only when every metric is scored
Scoring table with one column in progress and the other hidden
Step 2 · Compare

Disagreements surface instead of averaging away

The dashboard puts every gatekeeper's score for every metric on one chart. A gap of three points or more is flagged. That is the conversation the forum needs to have; the average would have hidden it.

  • Per-category bars against your Mid and High thresholds
  • Per-interviewer breakdown
  • Strengths and gaps, ranked
Dot plot of every metric per interviewer with disagreements highlighted
Step 3 · Decide

A recommendation by rules, a decision on record

Once the quorum has submitted, written rules turn scores and verdicts into Hire, Hire with reservations, No hire, or "talk first". An admin records the final call with a rationale, and the audit log keeps it.

  • Rules visible on the card, same for every candidate
  • Brief for the hiring manager: build on, focus goals, warnings, next steps
  • PDF report and a Slack-ready summary in one click
Final decision card with recommendation and reasons

What you get

Everything the forum needs, nothing it has to maintain.

Blind scoring

Other interviewers' scores stay invisible until you submit. Enforced in the database.

Disagreement flags

Any metric where gatekeepers differ by 3+ points is marked. Averages don't hide it.

Decision rules

Verdicts plus band produce the recommendation. Same rules for every candidate, visible on the card.

Hiring-manager brief

Build-on strengths, 90-day focus goals, warnings and next steps, generated from the scores.

PDF report

Three pages: summary and decision, the full scoring table, the per-metric chart with notes.

Calibration

See which gatekeepers grade high or low against the forum, before it skews a decision.

The rules, in the open

Scores are weight × average ÷ 10, categories roll up by weight, and the recommendation follows this table. No hidden model.

Gatekeeper verdictsOverall bandRecommendation
All positiveHighHire
All positiveMid, nothing below the barHire, with reservations
All positiveLow, or a category below the barForum sync needed
All negativeAnyNo hire
SplitAnyForum sync needed

Who does what

One workspace per company, one role per person. The database enforces every line of this.

Viewer

Recruiters, HR partners
  • Follow candidates and dashboards
  • Export reports

Gatekeeper

Forum members, hiring managers
  • Add candidates
  • Score, submit, reopen their own evaluation
  • Everything a viewer can

Admin

Whoever runs the forum
  • Record decisions
  • Edit the template and rules
  • Invite, change roles, remove members
  • Read the audit log

Owner

One per workspace
  • Everything an admin can
  • Transfer ownership
  • Delete the workspace

Built for the forum, not for the ATS.

Hirebar doesn't replace your applicant tracking system, your recruiters or your interviews. It replaces the part where five senior people's judgement turns into one Slack message. Invite the forum, pick a template, and put the next candidate through it.

Open HirebarRead the help pageGoogle or email sign-in · invitation-only workspaces · data stays per company